TATVA turns any job description into a role-specific technical skill assessment, scores every candidate on the same rubric, and hands you a ranked, evidence-backed shortlist, with no engineers needed to set it up.
Built for hiring teams screening 3+ technical roles this quarter. (Looking for a candidate test? TATVA is used by employers to assess applicants.)
Create your workspace in under a minute.
By signing up you agree to be contacted about TATVA. See our privacy policy.
Most teams still screen developers and analysts with résumés, keyword filters and a pile of generic tests. Here's what that costs.
Recruiters read hundreds of résumés to find a handful worth a technical interview.
Manual, slow, inconsistentTATVA: automated candidate screeningTitles and keywords say little about whether someone can actually do the job.
GuessworkTATVA: real skill evaluationFixed test libraries rarely match the stack, seniority or domain you're hiring for.
One-size-fits-allTATVA: assessment built from your JDWhen different candidates face different bars, fairness and consistency suffer.
Subjective shortlistsTATVA: one rubric, every candidateRemote tests raise integrity questions: who took it, and how?
Unverified scoresTATVA: integrity monitoringLean TA teams can't wait on engineering to configure yet another platform.
Long onboardingTATVA: recruiter-first, no-codePick a role, hit generate, and watch TATVA build an assessment blueprint and a sample candidate scorecard.
An automated technical screening workflow your recruiters can run on day one.
Paste or upload the job description. No templates to configure.
TATVA builds a role-specific technical skill assessment automatically.
Send one link. Candidates complete the assessment online.
Automated checks help you trust that scores reflect the candidate.
Review a ranked shortlist with evidence behind every score.
Prefer to explore on your own? Watch the walkthrough to see how TATVA works.

Different tools solve different problems. Here is how TATVA's approach stacks up against the two ways most teams screen today.
| What matters in a hiring assessment | TATVA | Fixed test-library platforms | Manual résumé + interview screening |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment built from your job description | ● Generated automatically | ◐ Pick or customise from a library | ○ Not applicable |
| Recruiter-led setup (no engineers) | ● Yes | ◐ Varies by tool | ● Yes |
| Same rubric for every candidate | ● Built in | ● Typically yes | ○ Rarely |
| Automated candidate screening & ranking | ● Yes | ◐ Varies by tool | ○ No |
| Integrity monitoring | ● Built in | ◐ Varies by tool | ○ No |
| Time to first live assessment | ● Minutes | ◐ Hours to days | ○ Days to weeks |
● Strong ◐ Partial / depends on product and plan ○ Not designed for this. Based on general category characteristics, so please verify any specific vendor's current capabilities.
Whichever tool you're comparing, score it on these questions. Then see how TATVA answers them in a trial.
Large teams need consistency at volume.
Lean teams need speed and low overhead.
Breadth is useful, but is it role-specific?
Library tests vs JD-driven assessments.
HackerRank, Mercer Mettl, Codility and TestGorilla are trademarks of their respective owners. TATVA is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.
One platform, tuned to how different teams hire.
Standardise screening across teams and locations with one rubric per role family.
No engineering overhead. Get from open role to shortlist while the candidate is still interested.
Assess analysts and engineers on realistic data scenarios with defensible scoring.
Screen across clients and role types without retraining your team on new tools.
We are opening TATVA to 10 founding teams. You get a 30-day free trial and hands-on setup of your first role. In return we ask for honest feedback.
Start a 30-day free trial and screen your first role on skill, not guesswork.
Start free trial →